In 1971, the United States significantly shifted its monetary policy by abandoning the gold standard. This decision, known as the “Nixon Shock,” was a turning point in the nation’s economic history and has had lasting effects on the global financial system.

The gold standard, which had been in place in various forms since the 19th century, tied the value of the US dollar to a specific amount of gold. This system ensured that the currency had a tangible backing, providing stability and confidence in its value. The Bretton Woods Agreement, established in 1944, further solidified the gold standard’s role in the international monetary system by pegging other currencies to the US dollar, which was convertible into gold.

By the late 1960s, however, the US faced mounting economic challenges. The costs of the Vietnam War and President Lyndon B. Johnson’s Great Society programs had led to significant budget deficits. The government was trying to spend money that it did not have. Additionally, other countries were beginning to question the stability of the US dollar and started redeeming their dollars for gold. This put immense pressure on the US gold reserves, which were rapidly dwindling.

In response to these pressures, President Richard Nixon announced on August 15, 1971, that the US would no longer convert dollars into gold. This decision effectively ended the Bretton Woods system. It marked the beginning of a new era of fiat currency, where the value of money is not tied to any physical commodity but is instead based on government decree.

The Consequences of Abandoning the Gold Standard

The transition to fiat currency had significant implications for the US and the global economy. Without the constraints of the gold standard, the US government gained greater flexibility in its monetary policy. This allowed for more aggressive measures to manage economic cycles, such as adjusting interest rates and controlling the money supply. This control allowed the government to spend money without having to back it up with physical gold. Gold no longer needed to be available for foreign entities that wanted to trade their dollars for gold. If the government needed money, they could create it out of thin air.

However, this newfound flexibility came with obvious problems. The absence of a tangible backing for the currency opened the door to fiscal irresponsibility. The US national debt began to soar, and the government increasingly relied on printing money to finance its expenditures. This led to a devaluation of the dollar and a loss of purchasing power for ordinary citizens. Since 1971, on average, prices have increased by approximately 632%. In other words, what cost $1 in 1971 would now cost around $7.32. Just since 2020, costs have increased by 22.8%. This is all based on the assumption that the Consumer Price Index is accurate. There are many reasons to believe that the percentages are incorrect based on biased ways of reporting price increases.

According to the Shadow Government Statistics (SGS) Alternate CPI, which uses methodologies from before the 1980s and 1990s changes to the official CPI calculation, the inflation rate would be significantly higher than the official CPI. While the official CPI might report an inflation rate of around 85-86% since 1971, the SGS Alternate CPI indicates that if inflation were calculated using the pre-1980 methodology, the cumulative inflation rate since 1971 would be around 1,000%. Regardless of the methodology, the point is this: the dollar has and continues to lose value rapidly.

Inflation became a persistent issue, eroding the value of savings and disproportionately affecting those with fixed incomes. The centralization of monetary control in the hands of policymakers, particularly the Federal Reserve, also concentrated economic power and introduced the risk of policy errors and market distortions.

A Call for Sound Money

The abandonment of the gold standard marked a significant departure from sound monetary principles. This move has led to fiscal irresponsibility, inflation, and the centralization of power. A return to a system of sound money, backed by tangible assets like gold or silver, would restore economic stability and safeguard individual freedoms in the face of an increasingly interventionist monetary policy.

Unfortunately, we cannot control what the government does with our money alone. However, we can implement the same principles that we want the government to implement. Instead of relying solely on Fiat currency, we can back our wealth by investing in gold and silver. The price of gold has increased by approximately 8,300% since 1971. This is why gold is the best way to avoid the adverse effects of inflation.

The post The Gold Standard, What Happened? appeared first on Fisher Precious Metals.

Fiat currency, like the US dollar, is not backed by a physical asset like gold or silver. Instead, its value is derived from government regulation and the trust and confidence of the people. It is valuable because the government says that it is valuable. It is also the reason your grocery prices continue to increase.

The Nature of Fiat Currency

Fiat currency is created through a process called the “Mandrake Mechanism,” where money is created out of debt. When a loan is issued, new money is created, and the money disappears when the loan is repaid. This system creates a flexible money supply, but it introduces significant risks.

Effects on the Monetary System

The shift to fiat currency has fundamentally transformed the monetary system. Central banks, like the Federal Reserve, can control the money supply, which can be used to manage economic cycles. Central banks can increase the money supply during economic downturns to stimulate spending and investment. Conversely, they can reduce the money supply to curb inflation during rapid economic growth.

However, this flexibility comes with challenges. The absence of physical backing means that the value of fiat currency is highly dependent on the stability and economic policies of the issuing government. Any loss of confidence in the government’s ability to maintain economic stability can lead to currency devaluation and inflation.

Inflation and Fiat Currency

One of the most significant criticisms of fiat currency is its propensity to cause inflation. Since fiat money can be printed at will, its supply has no intrinsic limit. This can lead to an increase in the money supply without a corresponding increase in economic output, resulting in inflation. Inflation is a hidden tax, as it reduces the purchasing power of money. When new money is created, new value is not. That value has to come from somewhere, and that somewhere is the purchasing power of previously issued currency. Inflation is a tax because it takes value that the everyday person has earned and redistributes it, often without the person realizing it.

Historically, periods of high inflation have been associated with excessive money printing, such as during the 1970s. The Federal Reserve’s response to high inflation, including raising interest rates, has profoundly affected the economy.

Conclusion

The transition to a fiat currency system has given central banks incredible power to manipulate the economy and the value of money. This hidden tax is the real reason prices continue to increase. Given the potential for inflation and economic instability, it’s crucial to diversify your assets to safeguard your wealth and ensure its preservation over time. Don’t put all your eggs in the fiat basket; explore other investment options to protect yourself against the unpredictable nature of fiat currency. It is prudent to put a portion of your net worth into tangible, physical assets like gold and silver. Something that cannot be debased, cannot be inflated, and has been used as a store of value for thousands of years.

The post Fiat Currency, Monetary System and Inflation appeared first on Fisher Precious Metals.

Every current and prospective precious metals investor should read this evergreen article by Alan Greenspan title, “Gold and Economic Freedom”.  Here, you will hear directly from the prior Chairman of the Federal Reserve, exactly why you should hold Gold, as indirectly, other precious metals such as Silver.

By Alan Greenspan – As reprinted from the book “Capitalism, the Unknown Ideal”  – by Ayn Rand with additional articles by Alan Greenspan

Gold: The Foundation of Economic Freedom

An almost hysterical antagonism toward the gold standard is one issue which unites statists of all persuasions. They seem to sense-perhaps more clearly and subtly than many consistent defenders of laissez-faire, that gold and economic freedom are inseparable, that the gold standard is an instrument of laissez-faire and that each implies and requires the other.

In order to understand the source of their antagonism, it is necessary first to understand the specific role of gold in a free society.

The Role of Money in Economic Transactions

Money is the common denominator of all economic transactions. It is that commodity which serves as a medium of exchange, is universally acceptable to all participants in an exchange economy as payment for their goods or services, and can, therefore, be used as a standard of market value and as a store of value, i.e., as a means of saving.

The existence of such a commodity is a precondition of a division of labor economy. If men did not have some commodity of objective value which was generally acceptable as money, they would have to resort to primitive barter or be forced to live on self-sufficient farms and forgo the inestimable advantages of specialization. If men had no means to store value, i.e., to save, neither long-range planning nor exchange would be possible.

Why Gold is the Ideal Medium of Exchange

What medium of exchange will be acceptable to all participants in an economy is not determined arbitrarily. First, the medium of exchange should be durable. In a primitive society of meager wealth, wheat might be sufficiently durable to serve as a medium, since all exchanges would occur only during and immediately after the harvest, leaving no value-surplus to store. But where store-of-value considerations are important, as they are in richer, more civilized societies, the medium of exchange must be a durable commodity, usually a metal. A metal is generally chosen because it is homogeneous and divisible: every unit is the same as every other and it can be blended or formed in any quantity. Precious jewels, for example, are neither homogeneous nor divisible.

More important, the commodity chosen as a medium must be a luxury. Human desires for luxuries are unlimited and, therefore, luxury goods are always in demand and will always be acceptable. Wheat is a luxury in underfed civilizations, but not in a prosperous society. Cigarettes ordinarily would not serve as money, but they did in post-World War II Europe where they were considered a luxury. The term “luxury good” implies scarcity and high unit value. Having a high unit value, such a good is easily portable; for instance, an ounce of gold is worth a half-ton of pig iron.

The Natural Selection of Gold as Money

In the early stages of a developing money economy, several media of exchange might be used, since a wide variety of commodities would fulfill the foregoing conditions. However, one of the commodities will gradually displace all others, by being more widely acceptable. Preferences on what to hold as a store of value, will shift to the most widely acceptable commodity, which, in turn, will make it still more acceptable. The shift is progressive until that commodity becomes the sole medium of exchange. The use of a single medium is highly advantageous for the same reasons that a money economy is superior to a barter economy: it makes exchanges possible on an incalculably wider scale.

Whether the single medium is gold, silver, sea shells, cattle, or tobacco is optional, depending on the context and development of a given economy. In fact, all have been employed, at various times, as media of exchange. Even in the present century, two major commodities, gold and silver, have been used as international media of exchange, with gold becoming the predominant one. Gold, having both artistic and functional uses and being relatively scarce, has always been considered a luxury good. It is durable, portable, homogeneous, divisible, and, therefore, has significant advantages over all other media of exchange. Since the beginning of Would War I, it has been virtually the sole international standard of exchange.

The Gold Standard and Banking

If all goods and services were to be paid for in gold, large payments would be difficult to execute, and this would tend to limit the extent of a society’s division of labor and specialization. Thus a logical extension of the creation of a medium of exchange, is the development of a banking system and credit instruments (bank notes and deposits) which act as a substitute for, but are convertible into, gold.

Free Banking System

A free banking system based on gold is able to extend credit and thus to create bank notes (currency) and deposits, according to the production requirements of the economy. Individual owners of gold are induced, by payments of interest, to deposit their gold in a bank (against which they can draw checks). But since it is rarely the case that all depositors want to withdraw all their gold at the same time, banker need keep only a fraction of his total deposits in gold as reserves. This enables the banker to loan out more than the amount of his gold deposits (which means that he holds claims to gold rather than gold as security for his deposits). But the amount of loans which he can afford to make is not arbitrary: he has to gauge it in relation to his reserves and to the status of his investments.

Bank Loans

When banks loan money to finance productive and profitable endeavors, the loans are paid off rapidly and bank credit continues to be generally available. But when the business ventures financed by bank credit are less profitable and slow to pay off, bankers soon find that their loans outstanding are excessive relative to their gold reserves, and they begin to curtail new lending, usually by charging higher interest rates. This tends to restrict the financing of new ventures and requires the existing borrowers to improve their profitability before they can obtain credit for further expansion. Thus, under the gold standard, a free banking system stands as the protector of an economy’s stability and balanced growth.

Gold and Global Economic Integration

When gold is accepted as the medium of exchange by most or all nations, an unhampered free international gold standard serves to foster a world-wide division of labor and the broadest international trade. Even though the units of exchange (the dollar, the pound, the franc, etc.) differ from country to country, when all are defined in terms of gold the economies of the different countries act as one–so long as there are no restraints on trade or on the movement of capital. Credit, interest rates, and prices tend to follow similar patterns in all countries.

For example, if banks in one country extend credit too liberally, interest rates in that country will tend to fall, inducing depositors to shift their gold to higher-interest paying banks in other countries. This will immediately cause a shortage of bank reserves in the “easy money” country, inducing tighter credit standards and a return to competitively higher interest rates again.

The Decline of the Gold Standard

A fully free banking system and fully consistent gold standard have not as yet been achieved. But prior to World War I, the banking system in the United States (and in most of the world) was based on gold, and even though governments intervened occasionally, banking was more free than controlled. Periodically, as a result of overly rapid credit expansion, banks became loaned up to the limit of their gold reserves, interest rates rose sharply, new credit was cut off, and the economy went into a sharp, but short-lived recession. (Compared with the depressions of 1920 and 1932, the pre-World War I business declines were mild indeed.) It was limited gold reserves that stopped the unbalanced expansions of business activity, before they could develop into the post- World War I type of disaster. The readjustment periods were short and the economies quickly reestablished a sound basis to resume expansion.

The Beginning of the Problem

But the process of cure was misdiagnosed as the disease: if shortage of bank reserves was causing a business decline- argued economic interventionists-why not find a way of supplying increased reserves to the banks so they never need be short! If banks can continue to loan money indefinitely–it was claimed–there need never be any slumps in business. And so the Federal Reserve System was organized in 1913.

It consisted of twelve regional Federal Reserve banks nominally owned by private bankers, but in fact government sponsored, controlled, and supported. Credit extended by these banks is in practice (though not legally) backed by the taxing power of the federal government. Technically, we remained on the gold standard; individuals were still free to own gold, and gold continued to be used as bank reserves. But now, in addition to gold, credit extended by the Federal Reserve banks (paper reserves) could serve as legal tender to pay depositors.

The Federal Reserve and the Great Depression

When business in the United States underwent a mild contraction in 1927, the Federal Reserve created more paper reserves in the hope of forestalling any possible bank reserve shortage. More disastrous, however, was the Federal Reserve’s attempt to assist Great Britain who had been losing gold to us because the Bank of England refused to allow interest rates to rise when market forces dictated (it was politically unpalatable). The reasoning of the authorities involved was as follows: if the Federal Reserve pumped excessive paper reserves into American banks, interest rates in the United States would fall to a level comparable with those in Great Britain; this would act to stop Britain’s gold loss and avoid the political embarrassment of having to raise interest rates.

The Results

The “Fed” succeeded: it stopped the gold loss, but it nearly destroyed the economies of the world, in the process. The excess credit which the Fed pumped into the economy spilled over into the stock market-triggering a fantastic speculative boom. Belatedly, Federal Reserve officials attempted to sop up the excess reserves and finally succeeded in braking the boom. But it was too late: by 1929 the speculative imbalances had become so overwhelming that the attempt precipitated a sharp retrenching and a consequent demoralizing of business confidence. As a result, the American economy collapsed. Great Britain fared even worse, and rather than absorb the full consequences of her previous folly, she abandoned the gold standard completely in 1931, tearing asunder what remained of the fabric of confidence and inducing a world-wide series of bank failures. The world economies plunged into the Great Depression of the 1930’s.

With a logic reminiscent of a generation earlier, statists argued that the gold standard was largely to blame for the credit debacle which led to the Great Depression. If the gold standard had not existed, they argued, Britain’s abandonment of gold payments in 1931 would not have caused the failure of banks all over the world. (The irony was that since 1913, we had been, not on a gold standard, but on what may be termed “a mixed gold standard”; yet it is gold that took the blame.)

Gold Versus the Welfare State

But the opposition to the gold standard in any form-from a growing number of welfare-state advocates-was prompted by a much subtler insight: the realization that the gold standard is incompatible with chronic deficit spending (the hallmark of the welfare state). Stripped of its academic jargon, the welfare state is nothing more than a mechanism by which governments confiscate the wealth of the productive members of a society to support a wide variety of welfare schemes. A substantial part of the confiscation is effected by taxation. But the welfare statists were quick to recognize that if they wished to retain political power, the amount of taxation had to be limited and they had to resort to programs of massive deficit spending, i.e., they had to borrow money, by issuing government bonds, to finance welfare expenditures on a large scale.

Under a gold standard, the amount of credit that an economy can support is determined by the economy’s tangible assets, since every credit instrument is ultimately a claim on some tangible asset. But government bonds are not backed by tangible wealth, only by the government’s promise to pay out of future tax revenues, and cannot easily be absorbed by the financial markets. A large volume of new government bonds can be sold to the public only at progressively higher interest rates. Thus, government deficit spending under a gold standard is severely limited.

Abandoning the Gold Standard

The abandonment of the gold standard made it possible for the welfare statists to use the banking system as a means to an unlimited expansion of credit. They have created paper reserves in the form of government bonds which-through a complex series of steps-the banks accept in place of tangible assets and treat as if they were an actual deposit, i.e., as the equivalent of what was formerly a deposit of gold. The holder of a government bond or of a bank deposit created by paper reserves believes that he has a valid claim on a real asset. But the fact is that there are now more claims outstanding than real assets.

The law of supply and demand is not to be conned. As the supply of money (of claims) increases relative to the supply of tangible assets in the economy, prices must eventually rise. Thus the earnings saved by the productive members of the society lose value in terms of goods. When the economy’s books are finally balanced, one finds that loss in value represents the goods purchased by the government for welfare or other purposes with the money proceeds of the government bonds financed by bank credit expansion.

Inflation and the Confiscation of Wealth

In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold. If everyone decided, for example, to convert all his bank deposits to silver or copper or any other good, and thereafter declined to accept checks as payment for goods, bank deposits would lose their purchasing power and government-created bank credit would be worthless as a claim on goods. The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves.

Conclusion: Gold and Property Rights

This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the “hidden” confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists’ antagonism toward the gold standard.

We also recommend that you take a moment and view the 2011 video in which Ron Paul questions Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke on “Is Gold Money?”

The post Gold and Freedom appeared first on Fisher Precious Metals.

Looking back over 2024, gold prices surged to record highs, significantly influenced by central bank buying. This trend was marked by unprecedented rates of reserve accumulation by banks around the globe. Let’s explore the key events and their impact on the gold market over the past year.

Record-Breaking Central Bank Purchases

Central banks were on a gold-buying spree throughout 2024, with total purchases reaching historic levels. Countries like China, Turkey, and India led the charge, significantly bolstering their gold reserves. For instance, the People’s Bank of China added a substantial 27 tonnes of gold during the first quarter alone, contributing to a total global net purchase of 290 tonnes in that period – the highest Q1 total since records began in 2000.

Geopolitical Tensions and Economic Uncertainty

Geopolitical tensions, particularly the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the resulting sanctions on Russia, prompted central banks to diversify their reserves away from U.S. Treasuries. This strategic shift was aimed at safeguarding national wealth against potential fiscal instability. By the end of 2024, these banks held 36,089 metric tons of gold, reflecting a significant increase from previous years.

Response to Interest Rate Cuts

A notable factor that impacted gold prices was the response to interest rate cuts by major central banks, including the Federal Reserve. As predicted, the Fed implemented a rate cut in September, which reduced the opportunity cost of holding gold. This move made gold a more attractive investment, contributing to its bullish run and pushing prices above $2,600 per ounce as we approach the end of the year.

The Role of Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)

In addition to central bank demand, there was a resurgence in demand for gold-backed ETFs throughout 2024. Western investors poured into these funds, particularly in North America, further driving up gold prices. The combined effect of central bank purchases and ETF inflows created a robust market for gold, sustaining high prices throughout the year.

Conclusion

Reflecting on 2024, the gold market was shaped by a confluence of factors but one of the biggest was central bank buying. As they strengthened their gold reserves and investors sought safe-haven assets, the outlook for gold remained strong. Given the favorable market conditions, 2024 presented a prime opportunity for people who invested in Gold.

Fisher Precious Metals Product Pricing

The post Central Banks and the Surge in Gold Prices appeared first on Fisher Precious Metals.

Gold’s price rise reflects concerns that world bankers, international monetary authorities (and you and I) should know.  Everyone in the know understands this is unsustainable.  The populous is told everything is fine and just continue to put your trust in the central banks. 

Debt is very, very easy to create with fiat currency.  However, the more debt you make, the less valuable is the previous debt you created.  You can not randomly create gold.  It only inflates at about 1.8% per year.  World governments know this, hence their increased gold holdings.

Not only is debt growing but, of course, the interest due on that debt continues to grow. Tell me, is this sustainable?

Gold price will continue to rise and do very well for the balance of 2024 and into 2025.  We could see $3,000 this year and probably $3,500 to $4,000 next year.  Silver should ride its coattails and maybe outperform.

Finally, I know that the gold price seems high. I have been at this for 30 years. It has always seemed high, and it’s going higher. Dollar-cost averaging in modest amounts on a consistent basis is, and always has been, the best approach.

Fisher Precious Metals Product Pricing

The post Gold’s Price Rise and Debt appeared first on Fisher Precious Metals.

With the world becoming more and more unpredictable, central banks worldwide are increasingly trading U.S. dollars for gold. There are several compelling reasons behind this shift. By delving into these specifics, we can gain a clearer understanding of how this could influence the price of gold.

Russia

Russia has been at the forefront of this movement, and its central bank has significantly ramped up its gold purchases. They have increased its daily gold acquisition by 700%. This strategy is part of a broader effort to reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar, driven by geopolitical tensions and economic sanctions stemming from the conflict in Ukraine. By holding gold, Russia aims to safeguard its economy from external shocks and assert greater financial independence.

Turkey

Turkey has significantly increased its gold reserves, reaching an all-time high of 584.93 tonnes in the second quarter. This aggressive expansion is part of a strategic move to diversify its foreign exchange reserves and hedge against geopolitical risks. Since 2016, the Turkish Central Bank has added nearly 300 tonnes of gold to its holdings and 14.63 tonnes in 2024 alone.

India

In 2024, India has significantly increased its gold reserves, with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) purchasing nearly 13.3 tonnes of gold in the first two months of the year. This move is part of a broader strategy to diversify its foreign exchange reserves and hedge against inflation. The RBI’s gold purchases have contributed to a $3 billion rise in forex reserves, reaching $648.5 billion

China

In 2024, China has continued its aggressive gold-buying spree, with the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) purchasing an additional 18 tonnes of gold in the first quarter alone. This move is part of a broader strategy to diversify its reserves and reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar amid ongoing global economic uncertainties. China’s central bank has been transparent about its gold-buying activities, signaling a strategic shift towards greater financial security.

The Case for Trading Dollars for Gold

There are several reasons why central banks are opting for gold over the dollar. First, gold is a tangible asset with intrinsic value, unlike fiat currencies, which can be subject to inflation and devaluation. Second, gold acts as a hedge against economic instability and geopolitical risks. Third, gold’s liquidity and universal acceptance make it a versatile reserve asset.

De-Dollarization Movement

This trend is part of a broader de-dollarization movement in which countries seek to reduce their reliance on the U.S. dollar. By diversifying their reserves with gold, these nations aim to protect their economies from potential dollar fluctuations and economic sanctions. As Americans, it is easy to become self absorbed and internally focused.. However, the world is quickly moving away from the dollar and towards gold. As the dollar becomes less demanded, it will become inflated even more than it already has.

Trading for Gold’s Impact on Prices

As more central banks buy gold, the demand for this precious metal increases, driving up its price. This trend is likely to continue as geopolitical tensions and economic uncertainties persist. For people like you and me, this means gold could become an even more attractive asset, potentially leading to higher prices. Remember, as the dollar continues to lose value through inflation, the price of gold continues to rise.

Future Outlook

Looking ahead, the demand for gold is expected to remain strong. Central banks’ continued shift towards gold is likely to keep prices elevated, making it a valuable asset for both national reserves and individuals. 

The trend of central banks trading dollars for gold is driven by a desire for greater economic security and diversification. As this movement gains momentum, it has the potential to drive gold prices even higher.

The post Trading Dollars for Gold: A Global Trend appeared first on Fisher Precious Metals.

Gold prices in 2024 have soared from $2,050 to over $2,350 per ounce. That is over $300 dollars, or an almost 15% jump, since the beginning of the year. This significant movement in the price of gold says a lot about the economy and inflation. The surge in gold prices can be attributed to various factors, but inflation concerns are taking center stage.

The Federal Reserve’s efforts to keep inflation rates in check have faced considerable challenges. This has contributed to the allure of gold as a hedge against inflation. Despite the Fed’s efforts and reluctance to adjust interest rates, inflation has remained stubbornly high. This is prompting investors to seek refuge in assets like gold. Gold is a great way to avoid the negative effects of inflation as it maintains its value while the Fiat dollar continues to lose buying power.

There is no reason not to think gold prices’ upward trajectory will continue throughout the remainder of 2024. With ongoing concerns about inflationary pressures persisting (not to mention a turbulent geopolitical sphere), gold is expected to maintain its allure as a safe-haven asset. Investors are closely watching developments in global financial markets, geopolitical tensions, and central bank policies for clues on the future of gold prices. As uncertainty looms over the economic landscape, gold stands out as a beacon of stability.

With all of this in mind, if you haven’t bought any gold yet this year and think you may have missed the opportunity, you haven’t. There is still reason to be concerned over the economic landscape, and gold remains a hedge against inflation. Gold is maintaining its growth and it is never too late to protect your wealth from inflation.

The post Gold Prices in 2024 Have Surged Past $2,350 appeared first on Fisher Precious Metals.

In a noteworthy rebound, both gold and silver prices rallied Thursday morning in response to signals from the Federal Reserve indicating a shift towards a more accommodative monetary policy. This positive momentum comes after a week and a half of declines in the prices of both precious metals, with gold hitting all-time highs on December 3rd before experiencing a subsequent drop back under $2000.

The yellow metal had faced a downward trajectory following its record-breaking highs, making this recent reversal particularly significant for investors looking to regain lost ground and creating a sense of optimism for future price growth.

Silver, often called “the poor man’s gold,” also witnessed a notable rally. The white metal had similarly experienced a price dip in the weeks following the recent peak in gold prices. However, with the growth in the price of silver, optimism for continued growth has increased.

The Federal Reserve’s indication of a looser monetary policy has prompted investors to reassess their portfolios, especially given the potential impact on various asset classes. The central bank’s move reflects a broader effort to stimulate economic growth and address prevailing headwinds.

This positive shift in the precious metals market, particularly following the recent volatility, underscores the intricate relationship between central bank decisions and financial markets. As investors navigate an environment marked by economic uncertainties, the renewed interest in gold and silver as safe-haven assets suggests a rekindled confidence in these commodities’ ability to hedge against rampant inflation and currency devaluation. 

The coming days will reveal whether this trend continues or if new developments will reshape the landscape again.

The post Gold and Silver Rally as Federal Reserve Signals Looser Policy appeared first on Fisher Precious Metals.

The price of gold has surged past the $2,000 mark and keeps rising as it gets closer and closer to its all-time high. Gold’s positive surge defies expectations amid high interest rates and bullish economic data. However, gold has proven its resilience, which begs the question of how reliable these economic indicators are.

The unexpected strength of gold, traditionally considered a safe-haven asset, highlights the complexity in the current economy. Historically, high interest rates and positive economic projections would lead to a decrease in interest for gold rather than an increase. This contradiction begs the question, what happens when the Fed inevitably drops interest rates? What kind of impact could an adjustment in interest rates have on an already increasing gold price?

Investors are closely monitoring developments in the gold market as they assess the potential implications for broader financial markets. The rally in gold may prompt a reevaluation of prevailing economic narratives and strategies as traditional correlations between interest rates, economic performance, and gold prices are being tested. This also raises questions about the legitimacy of the claims that the economy is moving in a positive direction.

As the situation unfolds, financial analysts and investors adjust their outlooks, recognizing that gold’s resilience could indicate underlying uncertainties not fully captured by current economic data.

The post Gold Surges Past $2,000 Despite Economic Data appeared first on Fisher Precious Metals.

Will gold and silver go lower? In a word – possibly. What would cause the metals to go lower?

Further hikes by the Fed make interest bearing instruments more attractive (Treasuries, CD’s, money market funds, etc.). Metals do not pay any interest (yield).

The DOW is negative for the year – people are moving to cash. And when they move to cash, they do so indiscriminately. This includes moving their paper precious metals holdings (ETF’s, futures, options, mutual funds, derivatives, etc.) to cash. Most of the precious metals market capitalization is held in these instruments. Physical holdings are only a small percentage – and physical holders typically do not sell.

The dollar index is at a high for the year, despite a huge expansion of the money supply, burgeoning
debt, downgrades by Moody’s and Fitch (with other rating institutions considering the same), BRICS gaining traction, BRICS expansion on the horizon, the executive and legislative branches in turmoil – the list goes on and on. Yes, in the end, the dollar is the best piece of garbage on the planet. At least for now.

Gold could go back to the $1650 range. Do not believe anyone who tell you it is not possible. When it did in 2022, six months later it had risen to $2050, a $400 or 25% move.

Will it go that low? Maybe. Who knows? If you are a gambler you can wait and see if you can catch the “falling knife”. Will it go back to $2050 and then some, absolutely. We all know
that. So, what are you going to choose – the gamble or the sure thing.

Bottom line – we do not know how low for how long. We do know highs and higher highs will return. In the end, years from now, it will be more important to have your position (accumulated the ounces / dollar value) you want, than to have gotten faked out by price fluctuations and come up short. Dollar-cost average in modest, regular amounts. That is what I do – picking highs and lows has never worked for me.

The post Will Gold and Silver Go Lower? appeared first on Fisher Precious Metals.